<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Validating XHTML</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flyweb.nl/index.php/2006/02/15/validating-xhtml/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flyweb.nl/wordpress/index.php/2006/02/15/validating-xhtml/</link>
	<description>nothing @ all</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.flyweb.nl/wordpress/index.php/2006/02/15/validating-xhtml/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyweb.nl/index.php/2006/02/15/validating-xhtml/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>That is a pity. What is &#039;PITA&#039;? The email was about the tab &quot;WordPress resources&quot; on &#039;Lorelle&#039;s&#039;. Your are offering some links that translate the WP manual. Amongst them you mention a &#039;dutch&#039; version. Helas that&#039;s a German version. I asked if you could correct that and if you know one in Dutch somewhere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a pity. What is &#8216;PITA&#8217;? The email was about the tab &#8220;WordPress resources&#8221; on &#8216;Lorelle&#8217;s&#8217;. Your are offering some links that translate the WP manual. Amongst them you mention a &#8216;dutch&#8217; version. Helas that&#8217;s a German version. I asked if you could correct that and if you know one in Dutch somewhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorelle</title>
		<link>http://www.flyweb.nl/wordpress/index.php/2006/02/15/validating-xhtml/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyweb.nl/index.php/2006/02/15/validating-xhtml/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I got the ampersand thing. PITA! And no, I didn&#039;t get your email. Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the ampersand thing. PITA! And no, I didn&#8217;t get your email. Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.flyweb.nl/wordpress/index.php/2006/02/15/validating-xhtml/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyweb.nl/index.php/2006/02/15/validating-xhtml/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Sorry but here is WP playing me parts again. My comment before this is confusing. I tried to write ampersand signs in to 2 different encodings but WP simply converts them back to plain &amp; signs. When you look at the source you will know what I meant. :{</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry but here is WP playing me parts again. My comment before this is confusing. I tried to write ampersand signs in to 2 different encodings but WP simply converts them back to plain &amp; signs. When you look at the source you will know what I meant. :{</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.flyweb.nl/wordpress/index.php/2006/02/15/validating-xhtml/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyweb.nl/index.php/2006/02/15/validating-xhtml/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Another thing we have to mention to the audience is the fact that only a single &amp; is a faulty one for validation. I just tested this on a remote script I use for stylesheet switching from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alistapart.com/articles/alternate/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Paul Sowden&lt;/a&gt; at Alistapart. In that script you&#039;ll find double &amp; symbols like so &lt;code&gt;&amp;&amp;&lt;/code&gt;. When I changed them to &amp;&amp; the script failed. So validation only requires that single &amp; signs need to be converted to their UTF-8 counterparts, &lt;code&gt;&amp;&lt;/code&gt;. And then something else. Since we are indirectly speaking about encoding, an ampersand (and many other symbols) can also be coded like &lt;code&gt;&amp;&lt;/code&gt; without a problem. Strange because WP is built around UTF-8 (look in your header for the meta). How come I wonder?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thing we have to mention to the audience is the fact that only a single &amp; is a faulty one for validation. I just tested this on a remote script I use for stylesheet switching from <a href="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/alternate/" rel="nofollow" class="liexternal">Paul Sowden</a> at Alistapart. In that script you&#8217;ll find double &amp; symbols like so <code>&amp;&amp;</code>. When I changed them to &amp;&amp; the script failed. So validation only requires that single &amp; signs need to be converted to their UTF-8 counterparts, <code>&amp;</code>. And then something else. Since we are indirectly speaking about encoding, an ampersand (and many other symbols) can also be coded like <code>&#x26;</code> without a problem. Strange because WP is built around UTF-8 (look in your header for the meta). How come I wonder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.flyweb.nl/wordpress/index.php/2006/02/15/validating-xhtml/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyweb.nl/index.php/2006/02/15/validating-xhtml/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Yes I do actually. The validating thing that still makes me a bit crazy is caused by the use of &#039;excerpts&#039;. It is a built in feature by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.binarymoon.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Binarymoon&lt;/a&gt; on the &#039;Regulus&#039; theme we both use. When I started out it seemed a good thing todo, to use the excerpts. On hindside I am not really sure. It&#039;s a bit wacky from time to time. There is only one thing to it. Per post, per comment, validation comes twice here. Ah well, I can live with that. Thanks for the comment. Always appreciated. BTW did you manage to adjust the &#039;dutch&#039; to &#039;german&#039; translations yet? Mailed to you on cameraontheroad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I do actually. The validating thing that still makes me a bit crazy is caused by the use of &#8216;excerpts&#8217;. It is a built in feature by <a href="http://www.binarymoon.co.uk" rel="nofollow" class="liexternal">Binarymoon</a> on the &#8216;Regulus&#8217; theme we both use. When I started out it seemed a good thing todo, to use the excerpts. On hindside I am not really sure. It&#8217;s a bit wacky from time to time. There is only one thing to it. Per post, per comment, validation comes twice here. Ah well, I can live with that. Thanks for the comment. Always appreciated. BTW did you manage to adjust the &#8216;dutch&#8217; to &#8216;german&#8217; translations yet? Mailed to you on cameraontheroad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorelle</title>
		<link>http://www.flyweb.nl/wordpress/index.php/2006/02/15/validating-xhtml/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyweb.nl/index.php/2006/02/15/validating-xhtml/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>You probably already know this, but for your readers, most advertising or javascript code that includes an ampersand will not validate. I found out that you need to change the &amp; to &lt;code&gt;&amp;&lt;/code&gt; and it will still work and the code will now validate. I hated that so I was relieved to finally find a fix that makes the code work and validates at the same time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You probably already know this, but for your readers, most advertising or javascript code that includes an ampersand will not validate. I found out that you need to change the &amp; to <code>&amp;amp;</code> and it will still work and the code will now validate. I hated that so I was relieved to finally find a fix that makes the code work and validates at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

